| Chinese Text Project |
| Search details: |
|---|
| Scope: Request type: Paragraph |
| Condition 1: References "至言去言，至為去為" Matched:6. |
| Total 6 paragraphs. Page 1 of 1. |
《先秦兩漢 - Pre-Qin and Han》 | Related resources |
《道家 - Daoism》 | Related resources |
《莊子 - Zhuangzi》 | [Warring States] 350 BC-250 BC | Books referencing 《莊子》 Library Resources Source Related resources |
《外篇 - Outer Chapters》 | Library Resources |
《知北遊 - Knowledge Rambling in the North》 | English translation: James Legge [?] | Books referencing 《知北遊》 Library Resources |
| 11 | 知北遊: | 顏淵問乎仲尼曰：「回嘗聞諸夫子曰：『無有所將，無有所迎。』回敢問其遊。」仲尼曰：「古之人，外化而內不化；今之人，內化而外不化。與物化者，一不化者也。安化安不化，安與之相靡，必與之莫多。狶韋氏之囿，黃帝之圃，有虞氏之宮，湯、武之室。君子之人，若儒、墨者師，故以是非相𩐋也，而況今之人乎！聖人處物不傷物。不傷物者，物亦不能傷也。唯無所傷者，為能與人相將、迎。山林與！皋壤與！使我欣欣然而樂與！樂未畢也，哀又繼之。哀樂之來，吾不能禦，其去弗能止。悲夫！世人直為物逆旅耳！夫知遇而不知所不遇，知能能而不能所不能。無知無能者，固人之所不免也。夫務免乎人之所不免者，豈不亦悲哉！至言去言，至為去為。齊知之所知，則淺矣。」 |
| Knowledge Rambling in the...: |
Yan Yuan asked Zhongni, saying, 'Master, I have heard you say, "There should be no demonstration of welcoming; there should be no movement to meet" - I venture to ask in what way this affection of the mind may be shown.' The reply was, 'The ancients, amid (all) external changes, did not change internally; now-a-days men change internally, but take no note of external changes. When one only notes the changes of things, himself continuing one and the same, he does not change. How should there be (a difference between) his changing and not changing? How should he put himself in contact with (and come under the influence of) those external changes? He is sure, however, to keep his points of contact with them from being many. The park of Xi-wei, the garden of Huang-Di, the palace of the Lord of Yu, and the houses of Tang and Wu - (these all were places in which this was done). But the superior men (so called, of later days), such as the masters of the Literati and of Mohism, were bold to attack each other with their controversies; and how much more so are the men of the present day! Sages in dealing with others do not wound them; and they who do not wound others cannot be wounded by them. Only he whom others do not injure is able to welcome and meet men. 'Forests and marshes make me joyful and glad; but before the joy is ended, sadness comes and succeeds to it. When sadness and joy come, I cannot prevent their approach; when they go, I cannot retain them. How sad it is that men should only be as lodging-houses for things, (and the emotions which they excite)! They know what they meet, but they do not know what they do not meet; they use what power they have, but they cannot be strong where they are powerless. Such ignorance and powerlessness is what men cannot avoid. That they should try to avoid what they cannot avoid, is not this also sad? Perfect speech is to put speech away; perfect action is to put action away; to digest all knowledge that is known is a thing to be despised.' |
《列子 - Liezi》 | [Warring States (475 BC - 221 BC)] | Books referencing 《列子》 Library Resources Source Related resources |
《黃帝》 | Books referencing 《黃帝》 Library Resources |
| 11 | 黃帝: | 海上之人有好漚鳥者，每旦之海上，從漚鳥游，漚鳥之至者百住而不止。其父曰：「吾聞漚鳥皆從汝游，汝取來，吾玩之。」明日之海上，漚鳥舞而不下也。故曰：至言去言，至為無為；齊智之所知，則淺矣。 |
《說符》 | Books referencing 《說符》 Library Resources |
| 12 | 說符: | 白公問孔子曰：「人可與微言乎？」孔子不應。白公問曰：「若以石投水何如？」孔子曰：「吳之善沒者能取之。」曰：「若以水投水何如？」孔子曰：「淄、澠之合，易牙嘗而知之。」白公曰：「人故不可與微言乎？」孔子曰：「何為不可？唯知言之謂者乎！夫知言之謂者，不以言言也。爭魚者濡，逐獸者趨，非樂之也。故至言去言，至為无為。夫淺知之所爭者，末矣。」白公不得已，遂死於浴室。 |
《文子 - Wenzi》 | [Eastern Han - Jin] 212-231 | Books referencing 《文子》 Library Resources Related resources |
《微明》 | Books referencing 《微明》 Library Resources |
| 3 | 微明: | 老子曰：何為不可？唯知言之謂乎！夫知言之謂者，不以言言也。爭魚者濡，逐獸者趨，非樂之也，故至言去言，至為去為，淺知之人，所爭者末矣，夫「言有宗，事有君，夫為無知，是以不吾知。」 |
《雜家 - Miscellaneous Schools》 | Related resources |
《淮南子 - Huainanzi》 | [Western Han (206 BC - 9)] | Books referencing 《淮南子》 Library Resources Source Related resources |
《道應訓》 | Books referencing 《道應訓》 Library Resources |
| 2 | 道應訓: | 白公問於孔子曰：「人可以微言？」孔子不應。白公曰：「若以石投水中，何如？」曰：「吳、越之善沒者能取之矣。」曰：「若以水投水，何如？」孔子曰：「菑、澠之水合，易牙嘗而知之。」白公曰：「然則人固不可以微言乎？」孔子曰：「何謂不可？誰知言之謂者乎？夫知言之謂者，不以言言也。爭魚者濡，逐獸者趨，非樂之也。故至言去言，至為無為，夫淺知之所爭者，末矣。」白公不得也，故死於浴室。故老子曰：「言有宗，事有君。夫唯無知，是以不吾知也。」白公之謂也。 |
《呂氏春秋 - Lü Shi Chun Qiu》 | [Warring States] 247 BC-239 BC Lu Bu-wei | Books referencing 《呂氏春秋》 Library Resources Related resources |
《審應覽》 | Library Resources |
《精諭》 | Library Resources |
| 4 | 精諭: | 白公問於孔子曰：「人可與微言乎？」孔子不應。白公曰：「若以石投水奚若？」孔子曰：「沒人能取之。」白公曰：「若以水投水奚若？」孔子曰：「淄、澠之合者，易牙嘗而知之。」白公曰：「然則人不可與微言乎？」孔子曰：「胡為不可？唯知言之謂者為可耳。」白公弗得也。知謂則不以言矣。言者，謂之屬也。求魚者濡，爭獸者趨，非樂之也。故至言去言，至為無為。淺智者之所爭則末矣。此白公之所以死於法室。 |
| Total 6 paragraphs. Page 1 of 1. |
|---|